Explanation
September 11 represents the pivotal event around which the entire book is organized, yet it is not read as an isolated occurrence but as a sign of a broader political, intellectual, and civilizational crisis. In the text, its meaning shifts between the West and the Arab-Islamic world, and it becomes a point at which discourses of legitimation, enemy construction, and the redefinition of the international order are concentrated.
Referred to from
- September 11 reconstructed the global conflict against the globalized world
- September 11 and the reconstruction of conflict
- September 11 calls for an international reassessment
- The September events opened a new global phase of American power
- The September events revealed the fragility of the international order
- The need for a multilevel analysis
- September 11 is a legitimizing turning point
- The event represents a multilevel rupture
- American policy linked power with morality
- Conflict as a calculus of strikes
- The Arab-Islamic world and the two faces of the event
- The title is linked to discussions of the event and Iraq
- The book is a dialogue about September 11
- The book reads September 11 as a multilevel historical and political rupture
- The historical turning point after September produced the logic of strikes and imposed peace
- A different interpretation of the September event
- A post-jihadi discourse in al-Qaeda
- The persistence of violence in the Islamic imaginary
- Refusing to reduce September 11
- September reshapes the political imaginary and the logic of global conflict
- Legitimacies after September 11
- The shock of September 11
- Understanding September 11
- Understanding September 11 requires analyzing ideological narrative frameworks
- An ideological reading of Islam
- A different reading of the September attacks
- From Manhattan to Baghdad links September violence and the war against it to a crisis of knowledge, legitimacy, and modernization
- The September attacks reveal a global crisis