The idea

This claim links Islamist movements to the social imaginary, that is, to the shared images and representations through which people inhabit their collective world. These movements are not understood only through their declared programs, but also through their capacity to touch what society imagines about itself and about its past and future. They therefore appear to be deeply tied to what is symbolic and collective.

Concise formulation

Islamist movements: are linked to the social imaginary

Its place in the book’s argument

This claim occupies an important place in the book’s argument because it shifts the analysis from the level of slogans to the level of mental and social structure. When Islamist movements are understood as linked to the social imaginary, the question becomes not only what they say, but why they find acceptance and exert influence. This is consistent with an approach that reads religious phenomena within their cultural conditions.

Why it matters

The importance of this claim is that it broadens our understanding of Islamist movements, so that we do not see them merely as political organizations or passing reactions. Rather, we understand that they are nourished by deep collective images. This is useful for reading Arkoun because it shows his concern with what moves public consciousness, not only with what is said in overt discourse.

Brief evidence


Reading questions

  • How does the concept of the social imaginary help explain the influence of Islamist movements?
  • Is analyzing the declared discourse enough, or is it necessary to pay attention to deeper collective images?

Degree of documentation

High: the claim appears in a clear location in the book’s material.