Formulation of the claim

The Qur’anic stories are presented as a representational structure, not as a purely historical narrative.

Explanation

Arkoun links the Qur’anic stories to a mythic or representational structure. Thus, these stories are not understood only as accounts of events, but as a semantic form that organizes meaning and presents it in representational form.

This means that, in Arkoun’s reading, the value of the Qur’anic stories is not limited to reporting, but extends to building a symbolic horizon that guides understanding and gives meaning its form within the text. For him, they are a way of speaking, not merely a record of what happened.

Its place in the book’s argument

This idea appears within Arkoun’s effort to read the Qur’an in a way that goes beyond historical literalism and understands Qur’anic modes of expression in their relation to the text’s broader semantic structure. It is also connected to his attempt to show that Qur’anic discourse operates through representational forms and modes of meaning, not through direct narrative alone.

Limits of the claim

This does not mean that the Qur’anic stories are reduced to a single function, nor that their representational dimension cancels their relation to their religious horizon or to their effect on the recipient.

Brief evidence

Page 274

Readings in the Qur’an Qur’anic story representation