Formulation of the Claim

Arkoun holds that Qur’anic discourse is a multi-generic religious discourse that combines proclamation, narration, legislation, representation, and divine glorification.

Explanation

Arkoun does not present the Qur’an as a text of a single mode, but as a discourse in which the functions of religious utterance move and overlap within a single fabric. He therefore draws attention to the diversity of its forms of expression, from exhortation to stories, from rulings to formulations that glorify God.

This characterization matters to him because it allows the Qur’an to be read in its discursive structure, rather than reduced to a single dimension. Multiplicity here is not a marginal detail, but a basic feature of how the text operates within the religious field.

Its Place in the Book’s Argument

This atom falls within Arkoun’s approach to the Qur’an as a complex historical discourse, not merely as doctrinal or legal material detached from its expressive forms. It is close to his theses that reject reductionism and call for attention to the different discursive genres within the Qur’anic text itself.

Limits of the Claim

This atom should not be taken as a final judgment that confines the Qur’an to a fixed list of genres, nor as a comprehensive detailing of every structure of Qur’anic discourse. The aim here is to highlight its plurality and its basic functions as they appear in Arkoun’s reading.

Brief Evidence

The distinctive feature of the discourse of the human sciences is that our knowledge is still incapable of understanding it in an adequate and correct manner. It acknowledges these difficulties and never denies them, while at the same time refusing the “solutions” in which society, through closed scientific specializations, forcibly fragments the communicative reality and its integrality. How can we read a discourse such as Qur’anic discourse, which plays on several registers at once?