The Idea

The text links the role of the Murabits to social and symbolic functions that go beyond a direct religious presence. They are not presented only as men of piety or exhortation, but as intermediaries who confer legitimacy and regulate the relationship to the sacred. In this way, their role becomes part of building social balance and managing religious meaning within the community.

Concise Formulation

The role of the Murabits: includes mediation, the production of legitimacy, the management of the sacred, and provision

Its Place in the Book’s Argument

This claim serves the book’s aim of showing that religious authority is not merely a theoretical discourse, but a network of practical functions within society. Legitimacy, the management of the sacred, and mediation are all tools that affect the organization of the public sphere. From this perspective, the example belongs to a broader argument that sees the understanding of religion as also passing through its social functions.

Why It Matters

Its importance lies in showing how religious authority becomes a force that organizes the community and regulates relations within it. This helps clarify the social dimension of the sacred in Arkoun’s vision, rather than reducing it to individual belief alone. It also reveals that religion operates within society through specific mediations, offices, and roles.

Brief Evidence

Reading Questions

  • How do symbolic functions become a source of social legitimacy?
  • What does the role of the Murabits reveal about the relationship between the sacred and social organization?

Documentation Degree

High: the claim appears in a clear location in the book’s material.