The Idea
This claim presents applied Islamology as a way to dismantle the rigid boundaries between Sunnis, Shiites, and Kharijites. The idea is not to abolish historical differences, but to view them from a broader angle that reveals what these formations share and what separated them. Thus, the aim becomes to understand the Islamic tradition in its broader extension rather than confining it within closed classifications.
Focused Formulation
Applied Islamology: dismantling the boundaries between Sunnis, Shiites, and Kharijites
Its Place in the Book’s Argument
This claim appears at a point that clarifies the aim of the project, not merely its tools. It serves the book’s argument by moving beyond sectarian divisions as an obstacle to a broad understanding of the tradition. In this way, it becomes clear that the purpose is not only to write a history of the schools, but to reconsider the way these schools are read within a wider Islamic horizon.
Why It Matters
Its importance lies in showing the book’s tendency to reduce the effect of sectarian boundaries in reading. This is important for understanding Arkoun because it shows his desire to reach the major commonalities rather than stopping at the separation among groups. It also helps the reader see disagreement as part of the history of formation, not as the end of meaning.
Reading Questions
- Does dismantling sectarian boundaries mean abolishing difference, or understanding it in a broader context?
- What is gained by considering Sunnis, Shiites, and Kharijites within a single horizon?
Degree of Documentation
High: the claim appears in a clear place in the book’s material.