The Idea

The text argues that the idea of ontological privilege is not confined to Islam; rather, it appears in other religions and different sects, and also in modern utopian movements such as scientific socialism and communist salvation. Thus, the text’s critique is not directed at one group alone, but at a broader human tendency that leads some conceptions to claim for themselves a privileged status at the expense of others.

Concise Formulation

The idea of ontological privilege: exists in other religions and movements

Its Place in the Book’s Argument

This claim serves the book’s argument because it broadens the scope of critique and prevents it from being confined to a single example. The aim is not to accuse Islam alone, but to show that the tendency toward absolute preference recurs in multiple religious and ideological forms. In this sense, the text places the problem in the structure of exclusionary thinking itself, not merely in a specific identity.

Why It Matters

Its importance lies in the fact that it reduces the selective reading that looks for the fault of one particular group while ignoring the general structure of the idea. It also helps us understand Arkoun as criticizing mechanisms of closed sacralization wherever they appear, whether in religious, political, or utopian discourse, because the danger lies in absolute privilege itself, not in the name of the bearer of that privilege.

Reading Questions

  • How does broadening the critique to different religions and movements change the way ontological privilege is understood?
  • What is the connection between absolute privilege and forms of exclusion in religious and political thought?

Degree of Documentation

High: the claim appears in a clear passage from the book’s material.

Brief Evidence

The text states that the idea of ontological privilege is not exclusive to Islam alone, but appears in other religions and different sects. It also appears in some modern utopian movements such as scientific socialism and communist salvation. In this way, the critique turns toward a general human tendency that grants certain conceptions a privileged status at the expense of others.