The Idea
This claim says that secularization by itself is not enough to end the crisis of establishing political legitimacy. Even after separating the political sphere from religious authority, the question remains: on what basis is legitimacy built? Secularization therefore does not solve the problem automatically; rather, it shifts it to another level that requires a broader historical and political answer.
Concise Formulation
Secularization: does not end: the crisis of establishing political legitimacy
Its Place in the Book’s Argument
This statement lies at the heart of the book’s diagnosis of the modern political crisis. It shows that changing the legal form of power does not automatically remove the underlying question of foundation. Hence the importance of Arkoun’s argument: what is needed is not a final slogan, but a deeper understanding of the relationship between the state, meaning, and public recognition.
Why It Matters
The importance of this idea lies in the way it prevents a superficial understanding of secularization as a ready-made solution to every political crisis. It also helps make clear that Arkoun treats legitimacy as a complex intellectual and social problem. This is essential for understanding his position on reform, since he links it to the construction of political meaning rather than to a mere change of name or form.
Brief Evidence Passage
This passage indicates that secularization alone is not enough to end the crisis of establishing political legitimacy. Even after separating the political sphere from religious authority, the question remains: on what basis is legitimacy built? Secularization therefore does not solve the problem automatically, but shifts it to another level.
Reading Questions
- If secularization does not settle the crisis of legitimacy, what remains necessary after adopting it?
- How does Arkoun connect political legitimacy to the construction of meaning within society?
Degree of Documentation
High: the claim appears in a clear location in the book’s material.