Book: When Islam Awakens
182 pages
- Modern secular religions dominate the imaginary
- Historicizing divine speech
- Islamizing the sciences obstructs the modern sciences
- Islamization of knowledge or the study of Islam
- The critical theses of Prague and Lambert
- Regimes of truth are constructed historically
- Augustine is a reference for understanding religious transformation
- Introducing the other lines is required
- Bringing revelation into the human sciences
- Al-Haddad’s reform opens a broader program
- Rethinking is not Salafi reform
- Reformulating doctrinal concepts
- Reunderstanding revelation and religion
- The possibility of a higher model of reform
- Ibn Abd al-Wahhab within a limited religious horizon
- Differences in methods of selection and composition
- Acceptable difference between religion and jurisprudence
- The dual meaning of orthodoxy
- The impossibility of making God a problem
- Invoking the human sciences
- The persistence of attachment to traditional religions
- The continuing debate between reason and revelation
- Personal status came under sacrality
- Orthodoxy bypasses the historicity of the text
- Arab crises are linked to historical blockages
- Fundamentalism was linked to Arabization
- Official Islam criminalizes deviation
- Ritual Islam is dogmatic and ahistorical
- Contemporary Islam is a sociopolitical instrument
- Contemporary Islam is historically contextual
- Contemporary Islam is emptied of spirituality
- Islam is subject to double censorship
- Islam within the social founding of truth
- Islam as given and received
- Islam, politics, and the West
- Islam makes the Sharia an all-encompassing center
- Islam needs critical knowledge
- Utopian Islamic reform
- Reform between return and deconstruction
- Reform needs a reflective theology
- Reform needs historical knowledge
- Exclusion is mutual among sects
- Jurisprudential difference is a sign of health
- Neopatriarchy as an explanatory model
- Islamic history is an embodiment of revelation
- Historicity is absent from medieval thought
- The European experience and the liberation of thought
- The Algerian experience in the formation of the project
- Global transformation is highly risky
- Tradition requires archaeological excavation
- Tribal solidarity compensated for women’s deprivation
- Deconstruction for analyzing the social imaginary
- The modern distinction between history and myth is absent
- Distinguishing supreme speech from ordinary speech
- The need for a new epistemology
- The need for a critical epistemology
- The need for a new emergent reason
- Western modernities are multiple
- European modernity is a condition for revising inherited tradition
- Western modernity elevated technical rationality
- Western modernity separated ethics from economics
- Modernity dismantles the alliance between God and law
- Modernity is understood sociologically
- Modernity did not solve the problem of revelation
- Modernity did not end religion
- Truth and legitimacy are linked to power
- Mythic narrative shapes religious meaning
- The theological discourse precedes faith
- The call for global solidarity
- The call for an archaeological-genealogical reading
- Defending the human self is a priority
- Modern religion does not end constraints
- Religion operates across multiple levels
- The market triumphs over the socialist and French state
- The conflict goes beyond colonialism and September
- The programmatic character of Arkoun’s thought
- Obedience to authority results from internalizing supreme awe
- Kabyle customs are not originally Islamic
- Kabyle custom wronged women more
- Doctrines need critical historicization
- The new reason needs material force
- Modern reason opens itself to the irrational
- Religious reason accommodates the capitalist system
- Reason is the servant of transcendent texts
- Reason speaks in the name of God and the Prophet
- Religious signs can be redeployed
- Secularism and undoing the dominance of political theology
- Violence and exclusion persist
- The West guarantees freedom of conscience
- Contemporary jurists are preoccupied with the margins
- Traditional Islamic thought is captive to jurisprudence and politics
- Consumerist thought weakens understanding
- International law needs refounding
- The Qur’an crystallized a Semitic symbolic language
- The Qur’an is the starting point of the project
- The Qur’an as a model of transformation into a closed text
- The epistemological reading of history
- Orthodox decisions close the field of thought
- The social imaginary and mobilization
- The social imaginary makes history
- Women are affected by multiple structures
- The marabouts as religious-social mediation
- Maraboutism between center and margin
- Christianity separates God from law
- Knowledge and religious discourse are closed
- The critical historical approach is necessary for understanding
- Scientific comparison precedes judgments
- Comparison liberates from dogmatism
- Comparison reveals differences in contexts
- Comparison expands the intellectual field
- The sacred is mixed with the forbidden
- The closed text obscures direct revelation
- Critique rejects confining the study to the Sunni
- Migration and fragmentation open the door to populism
- The gap between Islam and the West has widened
- American hegemony after 1990
- Revelation is understood as human speech
- Access to divine speech is indirect
- Judaism links the law to God’s presence
- The spread of Arabization brought the Kabyles closer to the texts
- The division of the two mental spaces
- The collapse of the supreme reference
- Two dimensions of religion in history
- The nationalization of religion after independence
- The historicity of reading women’s status
- Women’s liberation is a condition for comprehensive emancipation
- Liberating women from patriarchal alienation
- Women’s liberation begins with freedom
- Women’s liberation and the horizon of human emancipation
- Analyzing the forbidden liberates from taboos
- The plurality of intellectual positions among Muslims
- Defining epistemic paradigms
- The varying meanings of tradition and orthodoxy
- The differentiation of religions in relation to law
- Revising knowledge about Islam
- Partial struggles are insufficient
- The study of the three religions is not comparative
- Studying Islam in comparison with Judaism and Christianity
- Studying the two epistemic systems
- The role of women in critical research
- Rejecting final judgments about women
- Rejecting exclusion, discrimination, and sectarianism
- The clash of the Islamic and Western imaginaries
- Early Islam is the reference for the value system
- The conflict between the exoteric and the esoteric fuels sectarian division
- The necessity of an emergent ascending reason
- The need for new thought and new solidarity
- The ambiguity of the relation between rights and spheres
- Separating politics from religious legitimacy
- Traditional legitimacies have lost their validity
- The jurists of the past were more serious
- Kant represents the horizon of the European Enlightenment
- Clerics have no authority over doctrines
- The Book has two distinct dimensions
- The impasse of the present and colonialism
- Societies of the Book are broader than the People of the Book
- Muhammad embodied charismatic leadership
- Indebtedness of meaning unites religions and ideology
- Indebtedness of meaning and obedience
- Questions of Islam within the unthought
- The state’s confiscation of religion
- The multiple meanings of secularization
- The debate between al-Ghazali and Ibn Rushd is foundational
- The debate on religious reform is necessary and rich
- A critique of the Islamization of knowledge
- A critique of ideological veneration of women
- A critique of the double standard
- A critique of the universal textual approach
- The dominance of official orthodox thought
- The dominance of neoliberalism and technical reason
- Unity of purpose between Sunnis and Shiites
- Placing Islam in its historical context
- The status of women in Islamic contexts
- The functions of blessing and legitimacy
- Contemporary Islam is shaped between censorship, mediation, and the disabling of epistemic modernity
- Religious reform needs critical plurality and social liberation
- Tradition constructs truth and difference through the authority of interpretation and value
- Modernity and secularization do not end the question of meaning and authority
- Religion produces meaning and legitimacy through orthodoxy and the imaginary
- Epistemological critique opens Islam to the human sciences and comparison
- Written revelation opens interpretation and establishes censorship
- Women’s liberation reveals the structure of alienation and calls for historical critique