The Idea

The text holds that the need for a modern universal ethics means going beyond older theological and legal frameworks. Ethics here are not reduced to religious belonging or to inherited legal formulations; rather, they are understood as a broader human horizon. This makes universality not an abstract slogan, but an attempt to establish an ethical standard broad enough to include people beyond the narrow confines of a closed tradition.

Concise Formulation

Modern universal ethics go beyond older theological and legal frameworks

Its Place in the Book’s Argument

This claim appears within the process of building an ethical alternative that is consistent with the book’s critique of older limits. The argument does not stop at deconstructing inherited formulations; it moves toward proposing a broader horizon for ethical thought. For this reason, this statement occupies a transitional position between critique and conception, because it shows what is meant to replace the older frameworks.

Why It Matters

Its importance lies in showing that Arkoun’s critique is not pure demolition, but a search for a wider horizon of ethical meaning. It also helps clarify its relation to the idea of the human being as the subject of ethical discourse, not merely a follower of an old system. Through it, it becomes clear that the book seeks to link ethics to shared life rather than to enclosure.

Brief Evidence

Reading Questions

  • What is meant by universal ethics: are they general ethics, or ethics that go beyond religious reference?
  • Why is going beyond theological and legal frameworks a condition for building modern ethics?

Degree of Documentation

High: the claim appears in a clear location within the book’s material.