Formulation of the Claim
Arkoun calls for a transition from classical ijtihad to a critique of Islamic reason.
Explanation
Arkoun holds that ijtihad, in its classical form, is no longer sufficient to confront the questions posed by modern Islamic thought. He therefore links epistemic renewal to a broader transition from juridical interpretation to questioning the very tools of thought themselves.
For him, this transition means opening the way to modern critique as a practice that addresses the mental and epistemic structure that produced traditional propositions. What is at stake is not replacing one ruling with another, but reconsidering the conditions under which understanding is produced within Islamic culture.
Its Place in the Book’s Argument
This atom belongs to Arkoun’s broader thesis, which distinguishes between partial reform and deep critical renewal. It converges with his call for a Critique of Islamic Reason as an entry point for understanding the historicity of concepts, the limits of traditional jurisprudence, and the place of ijtihad in the modern age.
Limits of the Claim
The atom should not be taken to imply a complete rupture with ijtihad or the cancellation of its historical value. Nor does it, by itself, provide the details of the alternative method or its applications in every field of religious knowledge.