The Idea
The text connects the contemporary revival of jihad with marginalization, poverty, the loss of rights, and the absence of justice. The point here is that the phenomenon is not explained by religious discourse alone, but also by the social and political conditions that make some people more receptive to a language of conflict. A cautious reading requires understanding this link as an explanation for the reasons behind its spread, not as a justification for its outcomes.
Concise Formulation
The contemporary revival of jihad: linked to marginalization, poverty, loss of rights, and the absence of
Its Place in the Book’s Argument
This claim appears within Arkoun’s attempt to link religious ideas to the social context that gives them force or changes their meaning. The book’s argument does not stop at describing discourse, but asks about the conditions that push it to appear in this form. Jihad thus becomes a sign of a broader crisis in justice, belonging, and participation.
Why It Matters
The importance of this claim is that it expands Arkoun’s understanding of jihad from a religious slogan to a phenomenon tied to the structure of society. This protects the reader from a superficial interpretation that confines everything to texts alone. It also shows that Arkoun insists on the relationship between religion, politics, and social deprivation.
Brief Evidence
It links the contemporary revival of jihad to social and political crises It links the contemporary revival of jihad to social and political crises: marginalization, poverty,
Reading Questions
- How does marginalization change the way the revival of jihad is understood?
- Does the text offer a social explanation, or merely a related observation?
Documentation Level
High: the claim appears in a clear location in the book’s material.